Profiting at the Expense of Others

Psychiatry and the drug industry do not profit from people recovering from their mental health problems. They don't make money on alternatives to psychiatry and it's bio-reductionest approach to the treatment of mental health. They simply don't make money and it's all about money for the drug industry and the psychiatric quacks they have in their pockets. They don't profit from a healthy diet rich in omega 3 fatty acids from fish, they don't make money on regular exercise, runners aren't big cash cows for the drug industry. They don't make money on real insight into your mental health problems, it's something they don't want you to have. They want you to reduce your problems to a genetic chemical imbalance that they claim is corrected by their drugs. They make money on psudoscientific nonsense, like in the drug commercials. They don't make money on insight or science. The drug industry makes money selling drugs, psychiatric quacks make money prescribing them.

Take a look at the drug industry. I'll use the criminal corporate entity Eli Lilly as an example. It's such a good example of greed and wrongdoing. I know for a fact that the people at Lilly knew quite a bit about their blockbuster drug Zyprexa, take a look at internal company documents. Apparently what they knew didn't stop Lilly CEO John Lechleiteir from encouraging drug reps to discuss prescribing Zyprexa to children and teenagers, something that would have lead to predictable problems for those kids. It's not only that, serious weight gain with that class of drugs is really only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to problems created by those drugs. Lilly makes money at the expense of those kids, it makes money on disability, cognitive dysfunction, obesity, drugs those kids might end up taking for diabetes. Right now that's how they're making money. Another example is how the company marketed the drug to treat dementia in the elderly knowing it didn't work. There's a good chance that they were aware that the drugs would be used by psychiatric quacks to chemically lobotomize those folks, making things easier and more profitable for the nursing homes they reside in. Something done at their expense. What you have is an industry making money at the expense of their patients, not from what's good for them. They profit from what's bad for them, knowingly.

The drug industry profits from knowingly replacing the science your doctor or even a psychiatric quack relies on with the shameless marketing of their products. There's a few smoking gun examples from the paper linked to in the article above here. It's marketing based medicine at the expense of patients. That's what's going on in the mental health field today.

02/27/2010 - Link

Ongoing Slander

I'm just the subject of a lot of really vicious dehumanizing slander. I think they're just lying criminals who want to tell just their side of the story while justifying their wrongdoing. I would never threaten anyone or even behave a little odd in public. Anyone who says I am is lying. I have no desire to harm myself or anyone else. I'm fully responsible for everything I say and do, without exception. Any mental health problems I might have aren't causing me any problems and I don't think they'll ever cause anyone else any problems ever. If anything my lack of mental health related problems are the problem for people slandering me for pretty obvious reasons.

Any intrusion into my personal life if completely unwanted. I have no control over the outrageous sexual comments being made. If they're questioning people about me sexually I have nothing to do with it. They are off on their own talking about things like that and I have no control over any of it. I don't want any invasion of my privacy at all. I don't like people looking at what I bought at the supermarket checkout. What flavor jelly I bought is to personal for me to divulge voluntarily.

02/26/2010 - Link

Nothing But Criminals

It's like people around me don't understand that what's being done to me is illegal. They have absolutely no legal right to do what they're doing. Eavesdropping and video surveillance anywhere a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy is criminal in New York State. Not leaving me alone, not letting me live alone is called stalking and harassment. When someone with no legal right does what they're doing it's a crime, that makes them criminals. I don't want my privacy invaded in any way. I don't want to be followed in public. I don't people I come in contact with questioned. It's as nonconsensual as nonconsensual can possibly be and it's causing me quite a bit of distress and material harm.

Any decisions I've made regarding my mental health care didn't cause me to lose any of my rights. People have the right to make those decisions regarding their care. In New York State people involuntary committed to psychiatric hospitals have the right to refuse psychiatric treatment. This is from Rivers v. Katz, 67 NY 2d 485:

In our system of a free government, where notions of individual autonomy and free choice are cherished, it is the individual who must have the final say in respect to decisions regarding his medical treatment in order to insure that the greatest possible protection is accorded his autonomy and freedom from unwanted interference with the furtherance of his own desires (see, Matter of Erickson v Dilgard, 44 Misc 2d 27, 28, supra; see generally, Olmstead v United States, 277 US 438, 478 [Brandeis, J., dissenting]; Union Pac. Ry. Co. v Botsford, 141 US 250, 251; Davis v Hubbard, 506 F Supp 915, 930-933; Pratt v Davis, 118 Ill App 161, 166, affd 224 Ill 300, 79 NE 562). This right extends equally to mentally ill persons who are not to be treated as persons of lesser status or dignity because of their illness (Superintendent of Belchertown State School v Saikewicz, 373 Mass 728, 370 NE2d 417). As noted by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma, "[i]f the law recognizes the right of an individual to make decisions about * * * life out of respect for the dignity and autonomy of the individual, that interest is no less significant when the individual is mentally or physically ill" (Matter of K. K. B., 609 P2d 747, 752).

They have no legal right to do what they're doing. Some nutjob just can't stalk you and break the law all he wants because he heard you had some kind of invalid psychiatric label. What they're doing is illegal and they have no legal right at all. Discrimination in law enforcement and housing based on disability is also prohibited by statute, namely the ADA. They're just slandering their innocent victim as being violent or prone to violence because they're monstrous heinous fucking criminals.

02/4/2010 - Link

Recent Comments

shah wrote: I'm just lifting my head out of the sand and realise that when you do a web search for the evils of these meds its everywhere. Now I've seen how its damaging my body, how not one doctor told me about these side-effects, how life could be if I continue ...

test wrote: testetest

Jeremy wrote: You might be interested in reading about the tactics used to trick targets into reporting the symptoms of mental illness. http://areyoutargeted.com/2010/11/tricking-targets-mental-illness/

fdf wrote: dasdas dasd a da

test wrote: another test - multiple levels