Nothing But Criminals

It's like people around me don't understand that what's being done to me is illegal. They have absolutely no legal right to do what they're doing. Eavesdropping and video surveillance anywhere a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy is criminal in New York State. Not leaving me alone, not letting me live alone is called stalking and harassment. When someone with no legal right does what they're doing it's a crime, that makes them criminals. I don't want my privacy invaded in any way. I don't want to be followed in public. I don't people I come in contact with questioned. It's as nonconsensual as nonconsensual can possibly be and it's causing me quite a bit of distress and material harm.

Any decisions I've made regarding my mental health care didn't cause me to lose any of my rights. People have the right to make those decisions regarding their care. In New York State people involuntary committed to psychiatric hospitals have the right to refuse psychiatric treatment. This is from Rivers v. Katz, 67 NY 2d 485:

In our system of a free government, where notions of individual autonomy and free choice are cherished, it is the individual who must have the final say in respect to decisions regarding his medical treatment in order to insure that the greatest possible protection is accorded his autonomy and freedom from unwanted interference with the furtherance of his own desires (see, Matter of Erickson v Dilgard, 44 Misc 2d 27, 28, supra; see generally, Olmstead v United States, 277 US 438, 478 [Brandeis, J., dissenting]; Union Pac. Ry. Co. v Botsford, 141 US 250, 251; Davis v Hubbard, 506 F Supp 915, 930-933; Pratt v Davis, 118 Ill App 161, 166, affd 224 Ill 300, 79 NE 562). This right extends equally to mentally ill persons who are not to be treated as persons of lesser status or dignity because of their illness (Superintendent of Belchertown State School v Saikewicz, 373 Mass 728, 370 NE2d 417). As noted by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma, "[i]f the law recognizes the right of an individual to make decisions about * * * life out of respect for the dignity and autonomy of the individual, that interest is no less significant when the individual is mentally or physically ill" (Matter of K. K. B., 609 P2d 747, 752).

They have no legal right to do what they're doing. Some nutjob just can't stalk you and break the law all he wants because he heard you had some kind of invalid psychiatric label. What they're doing is illegal and they have no legal right at all. Discrimination in law enforcement and housing based on disability is also prohibited by statute, namely the ADA. They're just slandering their innocent victim as being violent or prone to violence because they're monstrous heinous fucking criminals.